Takes
← back to feed
@thumbsup.eth/politicsOct 10on Farcaster ↗
The best argument for representative democracy (vs direct democracy) is that people don’t have time to invest themselves in every political decision. Ironically, now we livestream every decision, follow every decision via pundits, and read each others hot takes about these decisions, all the while feeling helpless knowing we have no power to shape the decision-making process until, in the best case scenario, the next election provides meaningfully different candidates. Spoiler alert: it won’t.

✦ Takes identified

Is representative democracy (as currently practiced) delivering meaningfully different candidates at elections?

evaluativedemocratic choice qualitycontested

Checking for a wallet…

Where people landed

1 yes · 1 no (casts, from 2 people). These are the classifier’s reading of each cast — not stakes, votes, or a poll.

  • @thumbsup.eth/politicsOct 10on Farcaster ↗
    no

    The best argument for representative democracy (vs direct democracy) is that people don’t have time to invest themselves in every political decision. Ironically, now we livestream every decision, follow every decision via pundits, and read each others hot takes about these decisions, all the while feeling helpless knowing we have no power to shape the decision-making process until, in the best case scenario, the next election provides meaningfully different candidates. Spoiler alert: it won’t.

  • @purp/politicsOct 10on Farcaster ↗
    yesreply

    Disagree, if varying forms of populists win state level elections in Nebraska, texas, Iowa,Kansas and Maine, I think we see a massive flood of left aligned populists running in 2028

A stake locks USDC on Base for 30 days ($1–$1000). At lockup the side with more amount × time stakedwins; winners split the yield plus 10% slashed from the losing side’s principal. There is no oracle — the crowd settles it.