There are so many ways to solve the coordination problem! Sharing a short list of ways I’ve seen the coordination problem was "solved" 1/ pass 10 governance proposals and do nothing 2/ form a working group to investigate why the last working group didn’t work 3/ offer points until everyone does the wrong thing very efficiently 4/ hire a community lead to announce a task that nobody owns 5/ let the community lead do all the work quietly until burnout 6/ just /poidh it and get it done
✦ Takes identified
Are governance-heavy approaches effective at solving coordination problems?
evaluativegovernance effectiveness
You’d be backing YES on “Are governance-heavy approaches effective at solving coordination problems?” — the opposite of what @statuette argued.
Checking for a wallet…
Where people landed
0 yes · 1 no (casts, from 1 person). These are the classifier’s reading of each cast — not stakes, votes, or a poll.
- no
There are so many ways to solve the coordination problem! Sharing a short list of ways I’ve seen the coordination problem was "solved" 1/ pass 10 governance proposals and do nothing 2/ form a working group to investigate why the last working group didn’t work 3/ offer points until everyone does the wrong thing very efficiently 4/ hire a community lead to announce a task that nobody owns 5/ let the community lead do all the work quietly until burnout 6/ just /poidh it and get it done
AI hypothesisSome argue formal governance proposals are necessary scaffolding even if they appear ineffective in the short term.
Nobody has actually argued the other side of this one yet. That is a guess at what they’d say.