Takes
← back to feed
@kennyOct 1on Farcaster ↗
I'm interested in AI too, nothing wrong with being interested but there are many people who will only care about something or believe in something when everyone else does and it's important to recognize when you see that pattern so you know you're building a community alongside someone who's genuinely excited from first principles, not excited because it's popular to be excited

✦ Takes identified

Is it important to distinguish between people excited about something from first principles versus those excited because it's popular?

evaluativecommunity authenticitycontested

You’d be backing NO on “Is it important to distinguish between people excited about something from first principles versus those excited because it's popular?” — the opposite of what @kenny argued.

Checking for a wallet…

Where people landed

1 yes · 1 no (casts, from 2 people). These are the classifier’s reading of each cast — not stakes, votes, or a poll.

  • @kennyOct 1on Farcaster ↗
    yes

    I'm interested in AI too, nothing wrong with being interested but there are many people who will only care about something or believe in something when everyone else does and it's important to recognize when you see that pattern so you know you're building a community alongside someone who's genuinely excited from first principles, not excited because it's popular to be excited

  • @mjc716Oct 1on Farcaster ↗
    noreply

    i guess, but i think it's perfectly credible to be genuinely interested in both for most of the same reasons

A stake locks USDC on Base for 30 days ($1–$1000). At lockup the side with more amount × time stakedwins; winners split the yield plus 10% slashed from the losing side’s principal. There is no oracle — the crowd settles it.