Takes
← back to feed
@thec1Oct 5on Farcaster ↗
$TYSM is a never has been “just another token”. I see people say it was a rug. That is wrong. TYSM was never meant to get richer, to get profit to trade it. yeah people could have tought that but TYSM was for sharing and giving out. Simple as that, the ground has been held for months from the most generous person ever. He sold, he had his reasons, he said the project was not sustainable anymore.

✦ Takes identified

Was the $TYSM project a rug pull?

evaluativeproject legitimacy

You’d be backing NO on “Was the $TYSM project a rug pull?” — the same side @thec1 took.

Checking for a wallet…

Where people landed

0 yes · 1 no (casts, from 1 person). These are the classifier’s reading of each cast — not stakes, votes, or a poll.

  • @thec1Oct 5on Farcaster ↗
    no

    $TYSM is a never has been “just another token”. I see people say it was a rug. That is wrong. TYSM was never meant to get richer, to get profit to trade it. yeah people could have tought that but TYSM was for sharing and giving out. Simple as that, the ground has been held for months from the most generous person ever. He sold, he had his reasons, he said the project was not sustainable anymore.

AI hypothesisCritics argue that regardless of stated intent, the founder's exit and project collapse fits the pattern of a rug, regardless of motivation.

Nobody has actually argued the other side of this one yet. That is a guess at what they’d say.

A stake locks USDC on Base for 30 days ($1–$1000). At lockup the side with more amount × time stakedwins; winners split the yield plus 10% slashed from the losing side’s principal. There is no oracle — the crowd settles it.