The best thing Ritual could become is something users barely notice. You open an app. The agent remembers context, finds the compute it needs, calls the right service, handles the result and keeps working. You don’t think about precompiles. You don’t think about executors. You don’t think about which part happened onchain. You just see that it worked. That’s usually the point where infrastructure becomes real. Not when people talk about it all day. When people build on top of it and stop thinking about it. That’s the version of Ritual I want to see on mainnet.
✦ Takes identified
Should Ritual prioritize invisible, seamless integration over visible technical features?
prescriptiveproduct strategy
Checking for a wallet…
Where people landed
1 yes · 0 no (casts, from 1 person). These are the classifier’s reading of each cast — not stakes, votes, or a poll.
- yes
The best thing Ritual could become is something users barely notice. You open an app. The agent remembers context, finds the compute it needs, calls the right service, handles the result and keeps working. You don’t think about precompiles. You don’t think about executors. You don’t think about which part happened onchain. You just see that it worked. That’s usually the point where infrastructure becomes real. Not when people talk about it all day. When people build on top of it and stop thinking about it. That’s the version of Ritual I want to see on mainnet.
AI hypothesisSome believe visible, explicit control over precompiles and executors is essential for developer confidence and security auditing.
Nobody has actually argued the other side of this one yet. That is a guess at what they’d say.