Takes
← back to feed
@trishOct 13on Farcaster ↗
Fair. I quick grabbed it I did read the article and genuinely didn’t know what you meant by bad. Feels like a fairly common red scare liberal hit piece on the guy. I don’t think it’s going to make a dent. I’m not persuaded and I’m not even a groupie Also crazy the pains liberals are going through to take him down especially right before the midterms It is silly to me

✦ Takes identified

Is the article a fair characterization of its subject?

evaluativearticle fairness

You’d be backing NO on “Is the article a fair characterization of its subject?” — the same side @trish took.

Checking for a wallet…

Where people landed

0 yes · 1 no (casts, from 1 person). These are the classifier’s reading of each cast — not stakes, votes, or a poll.

  • @trishOct 13on Farcaster ↗
    no

    Fair. I quick grabbed it I did read the article and genuinely didn’t know what you meant by bad. Feels like a fairly common red scare liberal hit piece on the guy. I don’t think it’s going to make a dent. I’m not persuaded and I’m not even a groupie Also crazy the pains liberals are going through to take him down especially right before the midterms It is silly to me

AI hypothesisOthers would argue the article raises legitimate concerns that deserve serious engagement, not dismissal as a hit piece.

Nobody has actually argued the other side of this one yet. That is a guess at what they’d say.

A stake locks USDC on Base for 30 days ($1–$1000). At lockup the side with more amount × time stakedwins; winners split the yield plus 10% slashed from the losing side’s principal. There is no oracle — the crowd settles it.